Clarification to avoid misunderstandings: While both Carol Gilligan and Susan Fiske have made significant contributions to our understanding of gender, their work doesn’t directly focus on the hidden curriculum. Gilligan’s research primarily centers on moral development and care ethics, while Fiske’s work focuses on social cognition and stereotypes. This article focuses on possible hidden curriculum and gender, while acknowledging the broader contributions of and inspiration from Gilligan’s and Fiske’s work.

The hidden curriculum of gender refers to the subtle, often unintentional ways in which schools and classrooms communicate and reinforce gender norms, stereotypes, and expectations.

This hidden curriculum can have a significant impact on students’ self-perceptions, academic and career choices, and overall development.

Scholars like Carol Gilligan and Susan Fiske have made important contributions to understanding how this hidden curriculum operates and its consequences.

Carol Gilligan

Carol Gilligan’s work has highlighted how traditional moral development theories, which were based on studies of boys and men, failed to capture the relational orientation and emphasis on care that characterizes many girls’ and women’s moral reasoning.

Gilligan argued that schools often reward and reinforce the more individualistic, rule-based moral orientation that is more common among boys, while devaluing the relational approach.

This can lead girls to doubt their own moral reasoning abilities and to feel that they don’t fit the mold of the “ideal student.”

Susan Fiske

Susan Fiske’s research on stereotyping and prejudice has illuminated how gender stereotypes can be perpetuated through subtle cues and messages in the classroom environment.

For example, teachers may call on boys more often in class discussions, or they may use examples and illustrations that are more relevant to boys’ interests and experiences.

Textbooks and other curricular materials may feature male protagonists and role models much more frequently than female ones. These subtle biases can lead students to internalize the message that boys are more capable and important than girls.

School environment

The hidden curriculum of gender can also manifest in the ways that schools and teachers respond to and reinforce gender-typical behaviors.

For instance, boys who are loud, active, and assertive may be seen as “normal” or even praised for their leadership qualities, while girls exhibiting similar behaviors may be labeled as “bossy” or “unladylike.”

Girls who excel in math and science may face pressure to downplay their abilities or to choose more “feminine” career paths.

Boys who are sensitive or artistic may be teased or stigmatized for not living up to masculine ideals.

Implications

The consequences of the hidden curriculum of gender can be far-reaching.

Students who internalize gender stereotypes may limit their own aspirations and choices, leading to gender gaps in academic achievement, career paths, and leadership positions.

They may also develop negative self-perceptions and feelings of inadequacy if they don’t fit the mold of the “ideal” boy or girl.

The hidden curriculum can also contribute to the perpetuation of gender-based discrimination and inequality in society at large.

Discussion

Addressing the hidden curriculum of gender requires a multi-faceted approach.

Teachers and schools need to be aware of their own biases and stereotypes, and to actively work to counteract them in their interactions with students and in the design of curricular materials.

They can also incorporate lessons and activities that challenge gender stereotypes and promote gender equality.

Parents and community members can advocate for policies and practices that support gender equity in education.

And researchers can continue to study the ways in which the hidden curriculum operates and its impact on students’ lives.

Reflections

Ultimately, addressing the hidden curriculum of gender is not just about creating a more equitable educational system. It’s about helping all students to reach their full potential, regardless of their gender. By challenging gender stereotypes and promoting gender equality in schools, we can empower students to make choices based on their own interests, abilities, and values, rather than on limiting societal expectations. This can lead to a more just and fulfilling society for all.

---

Image by “UggleMamma”/Pixabay